
Project Title: Beyond Compliance: Embedding DEI in Organizational Culture During Times of Change
Audience:
For Facilitators: Trainers, consultants, or in-house DEI professionals delivering inclusive learning experiences.
For Learners: Small business owners, HR managers, and team leads with a foundational understanding of DEI.
Technology/Format:
This course is designed for Virtual Instructor-Led Training (VILT) and requires a platform that supports interactive learning. It requires a virtual meeting platform like Adobe Connect, MS Teams, Google Meet, or Zoom. The chosen platform should have the following capabilities: breakout room functionality for small-group discussions, screen sharing to support visual content, live polling for interactive feedback, and real-time chat for participant engagement. Additionally, essential accessibility features like closed captioning and screen reader compatibility are recommended to ensure a seamless experience for all users.
Overview:
This interactive VILT course helps small organizations embed DEI in real, actionable ways—especially in times of legal, political, and cultural change. Rather than focusing on compliance checklists or surface-level training, this course invites participants to critically examine their own policies across five key domains:
Recruitment & Hiring
Onboarding & Retention
Training & Development
Workplace Culture & Communication
Legal & Regulatory Compliance
Using a scenario-based approach, participants step into role-based discussions and work collaboratively to uncover unintended barriers in policies that may seem neutral on the surface. The course creates space for nuanced conversations about belonging, access, and the business case for inclusion—without shaming or oversimplifying complex issues.
Design Goals
This course was created in response to a growing tension: many organizations still want to do meaningful DEI work, but the political and legal landscape is shifting rapidly. In this moment—where uncertainty, fear of backlash, or concern about “saying the wrong thing” can stall progress—this course helps organizations move forward with confidence and care.
My goals in designing this course were to:
Support quiet, sustainable change—without sparking backlash. Rather than focusing on buzzwords or performative gestures, this course helps organizations embed equity into their existing systems—from hiring to communication practices—using strategies that are thoughtful, legally sound, and culturally responsive.
Offer a clear alternative to checkbox compliance. This isn’t about surface-level diversity statements. The course invites participants to reflect deeply on their own systems, then revise real policies to remove barriers, increase access, and improve belonging.
Model inclusive facilitation and design. Every part of this course models the kind of inclusive, accessible practices it teaches—from collaborative tools to how discussions are structured. It equips facilitators with strategies they can use far beyond the training itself.
Instructional Design Choices
-
Participants worked through real-world DEI dilemmas drawn from fictional companies. These scenarios were grounded in common challenges like vague “culture fit” language in hiring, unclear communication norms, and onboarding practices that unintentionally exclude.
-
Learners were assigned both a role (e.g., employee, team lead, HR/ops, leadership) and a fictional organization with its own culture and context. This structure encouraged them to explore each DEI challenge from multiple angles—balancing individual experiences, power dynamics, and organizational priorities.
Using a jigsaw model, learners first discussed challenges in role-based groups, then reassembled into their organization-based teams to co-create policy solutions. This encouraged cross-functional thinking and empathy across perspectives.
-
The training unfolds over multiple rounds, with participants returning to the same policies after gathering insights from others. Each round deepened analysis and encouraged iteration, mirroring the real-life process of testing and refining inclusion efforts.
-
To model inclusive facilitation practices, the course incorporates a variety of digital tools that supported multiple modes of participation. Participants use:
Mentimeter for live polling and real-time sentiment checks
Jamboard for visual brainstorming and anonymous idea capture
Google Docs for collaborative policy edits and note-taking
Padlet for co-creating knowledge, sharing resources, and surfacing themes across groups
Each tool was intentionally chosen to support varied energy levels, communication preferences, and accessibility needs, ensuring all learners had equitable ways to engage.
-
The course begins with learners reflecting on their own lived experiences of belonging (or exclusion), creating a foundation of emotional connection and relevance. From there, learners step into fictional roles and organizations, exploring DEI challenges through multiple perspectives and examining how power, responsibility, and organizational culture shape outcomes.
Only after building this shared understanding and psychological safety do participants return to reflect on their real-world contexts—applying what they’ve learned to examine policies and practices in their own organizations.
-
To support long-term impact beyond the session, learners received practical tools and prompts designed to spark analysis and action within their own organizations. These included:
Policy & practice artifact analysis: Participants reviewed sample policies across five domains (hiring, onboarding, training, culture, compliance) to surface subtle barriers and exclusion risks. This built the foundation for critiquing and revising their own documents later on.
Organizational audit starters: Learners take home annotated sample policies, checklists, and guiding questions to help evaluate how their organization supports (or unintentionally undermines) DEI values. These resources made it easier to start internal conversations with clarity and care.
Survey design for insight: One activity involved designing employee satisfaction or belonging survey questions aligned with their organization’s context. This helped participants think critically about how to measure culture, inclusion, and engagement in ways that feel authentic—not performative.
Independent reflection prompts: Participants received takeaway prompts and optional action planning guides to continue reflecting after the course. These tools helped learners translate insight into next steps that are low-risk, context-specific, and meaningful.